Jump to content

DaveC

Members
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

DaveC's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. When a call forward when busy option is set for an extension via the pbx interface, a CFwd message is displayed on the screen on the Snom 320. The users have been seeing this message and thinking that their phones are forwarding calls, and then removing all forwarding. I can understand this message being displayed when a Forward All option is set, but not when busy, is there a way to stop this from being displayed? This happens with the latest official and beta releases of Snom One and Snom 320 FW 8.4.18
  2. Buttons worked spot on, thanks very much
  3. I am not using button profiles, will give it a try.
  4. Thanks for that, phones now provisioning properly. Unfortunately, my original issue still remains, any ideas?
  5. I assume you mean the relevant Snom XML from the drop down box? I have added the line in so that the Snom320.xml looks like this; <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <setting-files> <file url="{http-url}/snom_3xx_fw.xml?model=snom320" /> <file url="{https-url}/snom_3xx_phone.xml?model=snom320" /> <file url="{https-url}/snom_3xx_fkeys.xml?model=snom320" /> <file url="{https-url}/snom_web_lang.xml?model=snom320" /> <file url="{https-url}/snom_gui_lang.xml?model=snom320" /> <file url="{https-url}/snom_320_custom.xml" /> </setting-files> However i get an error when it requests the snom_320_custom.xml file; [8] 2011/01/25 10:24:36: Received request for file snom_320_custom.xml [8] 2011/01/25 10:24:36: Error finding snom_320_custom.xml, Send back 404 Not Found I still have the snom_320_custom.xml in the tftp folder as required before, do i need to move it somewhere else? Thanks
  6. Beta version obtained, thanks. I have just installed this, rebooted the phones, and now they no longer get their settings from the custom xml files in the tftp folder, meaning the function keys and other options do not provision. Have I missed something in the setup?
  7. Hi I have a problem with the BLF indicators not working, can anyone help? Running Snom One Version 2011-4.2.0.3958 (Win32) Using Snom 320's/360's FW 8.4.18 The function keys on each phone are set as follows <fkey idx="0" context="active" label="" perm="">blf <sip:600@192.168.110.3;user=phone></fkey> <fkey idx="1" context="active" label="" perm="">blf <sip:602@192.168.110.3;user=phone></fkey> <fkey idx="2" context="active" label="" perm="">blf <sip:604@192.168.110.3;user=phone></fkey> <fkey idx="3" context="active" label="" perm="">blf <sip:606@192.168.110.3;user=phone></fkey> <fkey idx="4" context="active" label="" perm="">blf <sip:608@192.168.110.3;user=phone></fkey> <fkey idx="5" context="active" label="" perm="">blf <sip:610@192.168.110.3;user=phone></fkey> <fkey idx="6" context="active" label="" perm="">dest <sip: *87@192.168.110.3;user=phone/></fkey> <fkey idx="7" context="active" label="" perm="">blf <sip:601@192.168.110.3;user=phone></fkey> <fkey idx="8" context="active" label="" perm="">blf <sip:603@192.168.110.3;user=phone></fkey> <fkey idx="9" context="active" label="" perm="">blf <sip:605@192.168.110.3;user=phone></fkey> <fkey idx="10" context="active" label="" perm="">blf <sip:607@192.168.110.3;user=phone></fkey> <fkey idx="11" context="active" label="" perm="">blf <sip:609@192.168.110.3;user=phone></fkey> Make a call to any of the extensions and the lights come on as they should, and the lights follow correctly when they are blind transferred. Problems occur when an attended transfer takes place, Example Call comes into Reception on 600, the call needs to be transferred to 601. 600 places call on hold, dials 601 and informs the user that there is a call for them. The transfer button is then pressed to perform the transfer and the call process is complete, however, the 601 indicator lamp does not illuminate on extension 600. Blind transfer works fine and the indicator light comes on as it should.... Obvious problem with this, as with one of our customers, is that the Receptionist on 600 does not know when 601 has finished on that call, defeating the object of the BLF. Am i missing a setting somewhere? Is there a different option i can use to get round this? Thanks in advance.
×
×
  • Create New...