Jump to content
Vodia PBX forum

Bronko

Members
  • Content Count

    65
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bronko

  1. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    You are welcome... One additional comment for DTAG Trunk Setup: Around the time of these issue (408) my extensions (phones: Gigasets, snom870) starts again to don't play a ringback tone for some called numbers; some of these DTAG, too. Over the years and for now I found these Ringback setup works as it should:
  2. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    Do you have an answer here?
  3. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    Sorry, once more: SIPS (5061) isn't available for private costumers on DTAG, but it seems they are playing currently on this feature. "Proxy address:" sip:tel.t-online.de;transport=tcp is working too!
  4. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    Cool, six years old: [Resolved] How to Force SIP over UDP I have to learn to use the all-knowing, all-seeing Trash Heap! (May be the DTAG is playing currently with SIP-over-TLS...?)
  5. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    Here we see _sips._tcp. have highest Priority (10), why the PBX don't fallback to next Prio _sip._udp. (20) or _sip._tcp. in the case of failure?
  6. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    Since I doubted the TLS Trunk availability for DTAG private costumers I tried to extend "Proxy address" by: sip:tel.t-online.de:5060 sip:tel.t-online.de;transport=udp Both is working fine: [8] 0:19:09.003 TRUN: Trunk 5: sending discover message for tel.t-online.de [8] 0:19:09.162 TRUN: Trunk 5 (03????????) is associated with the following addresses: udp:217.0.128.132:5060 Why the PBX was using TLS since July, 10 at 02:38 am? Different NAPTR record in DNS of tel.t-online.de?
  7. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    Solved, next post.
  8. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    Oh, sorry. What I meant: for sure, my IP belongs to DTAG, because I'm a costumer of DTAG. And yes, this is a must to register.
  9. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    For sure....?!? I have masked out my IP for privacy, but I'm DTAG costumer since 20 years, believe me ;-) Let's debug!
  10. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    What do you mean?
  11. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    Here we have the Log Entries for one of my DTAG Number with normal (currently failed Registration) "Proxy address": "tel.t-online.de" [8] 18:23:52.446 TRUN: Trunk 5: Preparing for re-registration [8] 18:23:52.446 TRUN: Trunk 5: sending discover message for tel.t-online.de [8] 18:23:52.449 TRUN: Trunk 5 (03????????) is associated with the following addresses: tls:217.0.20.212:5061 tls:217.0.3.228:5061 tls:217.0.3.244:5061 [8] 18:23:52.450 TRUN: Trunk 03????????): Sending registration to sip:tel.t-online.de ... [5] 18:24:24.451 TRUN: Registration on trunk 5 (03????????) failed with code 408. Retry in 60 seconds May be we don't have to use TLS here?
  12. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    Nope, I'm on ver. 59.0 (FreeBSD, see above) due to: FreeBSD: 59.0 -> 60.0, libstdc++.so.6 Fehler Once more, as a DTAG end user we are using nonTLS Trunks, isn't so? "It helps to set the "Proxy address" to "sip:217.0.128.132" for the trunk, but isn't really nice." (issue discription) Flow Sequence in this case:
  13. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    Not a single message at log level 9 for TLS!
  14. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    Nearly closed, no technical assistance from DTAG. No once know how to escalate the SR.
  15. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    No, wasn't in there. To add T-TeleSec GlobalRoot Class 2 as "Trusted Root CA for server authentication" doesn't changed the behavior. As DTAG end user we are using TLS Trunks...?
  16. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    It is permanent since 4 days. DNS Cache: Type Address Content TTL A d-eps-608.edns.t-ipnet.de 217.0.3.228 55:28 A h2-eps-608.edns.t-ipnet.de 217.0.3.244 55:28 A proxy.dus.net 83.125.8.71 01:28 A proxy.live.sipgate.de 217.10.68.147 21:08:48 A s-eps-608.edns.t-ipnet.de 217.0.20.212 55:28 A sip.iptel.org 212.79.111.155 55:28 A sipgate.de 217.10.79.9 02:55:28 AAAA d-eps-608.edns.t-ipnet.de 25:28 AAAA h2-eps-608.edns.t-ipnet.de 25:28 AAAA proxy.dus.net 55:28 AAAA proxy.live.sipgate.de [2001:ab7::2] 21:08:48 AAAA s-eps-608.edns.t-ipnet.de 25:28 AAAA sip.iptel.org 02:46:08 AAAA sipgate.de [2001:ab7::4] 02:55:28 NAPTR proxy.dus.net 0 50 s SIP+D2U - _sip._udp.proxy.dus.net 01:28 NAPTR sip.iptel.org 02:46:08 NAPTR tel.t-online.de 30 0 s SIP+D2T - _sip._tcp.tel.t-online.de 20 0 s SIP+D2U - _sip._udp.tel.t-online.de 10 0 s SIPS+D2T - _sips._tcp.tel.t-online.de 01:55:28 SRV _sip._tcp.sip.iptel.org 02:46:08 SRV _sip._tls.sip.iptel.org 02:46:08 SRV _sip._udp.proxy.dus.net 0 0 proxy.dus.net 5060 01:28 SRV _sip._udp.sip.iptel.org 02:46:08 SRV _sips._tcp.sip.iptel.org 02:46:08 SRV _sips._tcp.tel.t-online.de 30 0 h2-eps-608.edns.t-ipnet.de 5061 20 0 d-eps-608.edns.t-ipnet.de 5061 10 0 s-eps-608.edns.t-ipnet.de 5061 55:28
  17. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    It seems Vodia in vacation mode too... ;-) Come on, lets debug again! Service Ticket created at DTAG additionally.
  18. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    Did not find any hints... I think the PBX is consulting anything/itself before consulting the operating system. No idea so far.
  19. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    What is strange: When I change the "Proxy address" from "sip:tel.t-tonline.de" to "sip:217.0.128.132" the awaited packets with string "tel.t-online.de" in details present, like the first DNS NAPTR request:
  20. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    Yes... the time is typical for Deutsche Telekom to load new running_config in network devices. $ dig -t NAPTR tel.t-online.de ; <<>> DiG 9.11.2-P1 <<>> -t NAPTR tel.t-online.de ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 61953 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;tel.t-online.de. IN NAPTR ;; ANSWER SECTION: tel.t-online.de. 4425 IN NAPTR 20 0 "s" "SIP+D2U" "" _sip._udp.tel.t-online.de. tel.t-online.de. 4425 IN NAPTR 10 0 "s" "SIPS+D2T" "" _sips._tcp.tel.t-online.de. tel.t-online.de. 4425 IN NAPTR 30 0 "s" "SIP+D2T" "" _sip._tcp.tel.t-online.de. ;; Query time: 0 msec ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) ;; WHEN: Wed Jul 11 16:19:24 CEST 2018 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 208 I'm currently on my investigation in wireshark, any special request?
  21. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    Forget to mention, the rest of Trunks for different providers are working as before...
  22. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    Hi, I'm back again with a new issue since today at 02:38 am. TRUNKs setup completely unchanged, but no REGISTRATION since tonight: TRUN: Registration on trunk 4 (03********) failed with code 408. Retry in 60 seconds It's seems there is no DNS resolving for "tel.t-online.de" in the "Proxy Address" to "sip:tel.t-online.de" since my pcap shows not a single packet for Telekom SIP or destination IP 217.0.128.132 or .133 ! Vodia is running in ver. 59.0 (FreeBSD) and here is the DNS answer from host system itself: dig tel.t-online.de ; <<>> DiG 9.11.2-P1 <<>> tel.t-online.de ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10901 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;tel.t-online.de. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: tel.t-online.de. 3600 IN A 217.0.128.132 ;; Query time: 119 msec ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) ;; WHEN: Tue Jul 10 20:47:17 CEST 2018 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 60 Once more: It helps to set the "Proxy address" to "sip:217.0.128.132" for the trunk, but isn't really nice. Flow Sequence in this case: Any ideas or hints for me?
  23. Hallo Vodia-Team, bis zur Version 59.0 läuft die PBX unter FreeBSD 11.1 mit einer vor längerer Zeit unter FreeBSD 10.0 statisch gelinkten libstdc++.so.6. Mit Update auf 60.0 erhalte ich nun folgenden Fehler: /usr/local/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version CXXABI_1.3.9 required by /usr/local/pbx/pbxctrl # strings libstdc++.so.6 |grep CXXABI CXXABI_1.3 CXXABI_1.3.1 CXXABI_1.3.2 CXXABI_1.3.3 CXXABI_1.3.4 CXXABI_1.3.5 CXXABI_1.3.6 CXXABI_1.3.7 CXXABI_TM_1 CXXABI_1.3 CXXABI_1.3.2 CXXABI_1.3.6 CXXABI_1.3.1 CXXABI_1.3.5 CXXABI_1.3.4 CXXABI_TM_1 CXXABI_1.3.7 CXXABI_1.3.3 Welche Library läuft bei Ihnen? Bin vorerst wieder zurück auf 59.0
  24. Bronko

    FreeBSD: 59.0 -> 60.0, libstdc++.so.6 Fehler

    Ich bin auf dem gleichen Release: [root@host]/root: freebsd-version 11.1-RELEASE-p6 Der Test mit der in diesem Release für mich einzig im Paket linux_base-c6 zu findenden libstdc++.so.6 zeigte: /usr/local/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.15 required by /usr/local/pbx/pbxctrl # strings libstdc++.so.6 |grep GLIBCXX GLIBCXX_3.4 GLIBCXX_3.4.1 GLIBCXX_3.4.2 GLIBCXX_3.4.3 GLIBCXX_3.4.4 GLIBCXX_3.4.5 GLIBCXX_3.4.6 GLIBCXX_3.4.7 GLIBCXX_3.4.8 GLIBCXX_3.4.9 GLIBCXX_3.4.10 GLIBCXX_3.4.11 GLIBCXX_3.4.12 GLIBCXX_3.4.13 GLIBCXX_FORCE_NEW GLIBCXX_DEBUG_MESSAGE_LENGTH Das Installationsscript der PBX kümmert sich um diese Abhängigkeit überhaupt nicht. Woher habt Ihr welche Version bezogen, damit ver. 60.0 läuft?
  25. Bronko

    Deutsche Telekom

    Problem solved! Thanks a lot!
×