Pablo

No luck! Here are the steps I took: from root, entered cd /usr/local/snomONE; from there, I ran a wget to the URL for the mini you provided; I then executed the following command chmod a+x pbxctrl-mini-5.0.2; then mv pbxctrl pbxctrl-old; then mv pbxctrl-mini-5.0.2 pbxctrl I then restarted snomONE (i.e. not the server). Now, my remote phone does not register and I can not access the PBX web login page, neither remotely or on the LAN. The weird part is, however, that I am able to access the admin section of the SoHo via x.x.x.x:81. I'm also still able to SSH. While in the working directory, I ran ./pbxctrl --version and the system's response was: ./pbxctrl: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_ARM_1.3.3' not found (required by ./pbxctrl) Any suggestions? (Yes, I did backup b/f trying this.)

I ran the Linux command and the result was: Version: 4.5.0.1090 Epsilon Geminids I'll try wget, next. When I click on the link http://snomone.com/downloads/snomONE/version-5.0.2.xml to get the URL for the executable, I don't see a line for a SoHo / Sheeva Update, like there was for 4.5.0.1090. Should I download this version: http://snomone.com/downloads/snomONE/debian32/pbxctrl-debian32-5.0.2 ?

I think the name is correct. But, just in case, here's a copy of /etc/init.d/snomONE #! /bin/sh ### BEGIN INIT INFO # Provides: snomONE # Required-Start: $remote_fs # Required-Stop: $remote_fs # Default-Start: 2 3 4 5 # Default-Stop: 0 1 6 # Short-Description: snomONE # Description: snomONE IP PBX ### END INIT INFO # # Author: Federico Musto <federico@snom.us.com> # PATH=/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/snomONE DESC="snomONE IP PBX" NAME=pbxctrl DAEMON=/usr/local/snomONE/$NAME DAEMON_ARGS="--dir /usr/local/snomONE/ --config /usr/local/snomONE/pbx.xml" PIDFILE=/var/run/$NAME.pid SCRIPTNAME=/etc/init.d/$NAME # Exit if the package is not installed [ -x "$DAEMON" ] || exit 0 # Read configuration variable file if it is present [ -r /etc/default/$NAME ] && . /etc/default/$NAME # Load the VERBOSE setting and other rcS variables . /lib/init/vars.sh # Overwrite VERBOSE value VERBOSE=yes # Define LSB log_* functions. # Depend on lsb-base (>= 3.0-6) to ensure that this file is present. . /lib/lsb/init-functions # # Function that starts the daemon/service # do_start() { # Return # 0 if daemon has been started # 1 if daemon was already running # 2 if daemon could not be started start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile $PIDFILE --exec $DAEMON --test > /dev/null \ || return 1 start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile $PIDFILE --exec $DAEMON -- \ $DAEMON_ARGS \ || return 2 # Add code here, if necessary, that waits for the process to be ready # to handle requests from services started subsequently which depend # on this one. As a last resort, sleep for some time. } # # Function that stops the daemon/service # do_stop() { # Return # 0 if daemon has been stopped # 1 if daemon was already stopped # 2 if daemon could not be stopped # other if a failure occurred #start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --retry=TERM/30/KILL/5 --pidfile $PIDFILE --name $NAME #RETVAL="$?" #[ "$RETVAL" = 2 ] && return 2 # Wait for children to finish too if this is a daemon that forks # and if the daemon is only ever run from this initscript. # If the above conditions are not satisfied then add some other code # that waits for the process to drop all resources that could be # needed by services started subsequently. A last resort is to # sleep for some time. start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --oknodo --retry=KILL/5 --exec $DAEMON RETVAL="$?" [ "$RETVAL" = 2 ] && return 2 # Many daemons don't delete their pidfiles when they exit. rm -f $PIDFILE return "$RETVAL" } # # Function that sends a SIGHUP to the daemon/service # do_reload() { # # If the daemon can reload its configuration without # restarting (for example, when it is sent a SIGHUP), # then implement that here. # start-stop-daemon --stop --signal 1 --quiet --pidfile $PIDFILE --name $NAME return 0 } case "$1" in start) [ "$VERBOSE" != no ] && log_daemon_msg "Starting $DESC" "$NAME" do_start case "$?" in 0|1) [ "$VERBOSE" != no ] && log_end_msg 0 ;; 2) [ "$VERBOSE" != no ] && log_end_msg 1 ;; esac ;; stop) [ "$VERBOSE" != no ] && log_daemon_msg "Stopping $DESC" "$NAME - Please wait from a few seconds to several minutes" do_stop case "$?" in 0|1) [ "$VERBOSE" != no ] && log_end_msg 0 ;; 2) [ "$VERBOSE" != no ] && log_end_msg 1 ;; esac ;; restart) # # If the "reload" option is implemented then remove the # 'force-reload' alias # log_daemon_msg "Restarting $DESC" "$NAME" do_stop case "$?" in 0|1) do_start case "$?" in 0) log_end_msg 0 ;; 1) log_end_msg 1 ;; # Old process is still running *) log_end_msg 1 ;; # Failed to start esac ;; *) # Failed to stop log_end_msg 1 ;; esac ;; *) echo "Usage: $SCRIPTNAME {start|stop|restart}" >&2 exit 3 ;; esac : Is there anything in here that needs to be changed? Thanks.

I'm running version 4.5.0.1090 Epsilon Geminids (snom ONE mini) on a SoHo. I followed the upgrade instructions on the snom ONE wiki and, under the System tab, copied & pasted http://snomone.com/downloads/snomONE/version-5.0.2.xml in the Software Update field. I clicked Save and checked the log, and read the following: [1] 2012/11/17 11:57:45: Performing software upgrade based on http://snomone.com/downloads/snomONE/version-5.0.2.xml [3] 2012/11/17 11:57:45: Software update: Removing file pbxctrl-old [1] 2012/11/17 11:57:45: Cannot remove file pbxctrl-old [3] 2012/11/17 11:57:45: Software update: Sending request for file http://snomone.com/downloads/snomONE/audio/audio_moh/bi_ced.wav [5] 2012/11/17 11:57:46: The type is not executable for file audio_moh/bi_ced.wav [1] 2012/11/17 11:57:46: Software update finished. If there were no errors, changes will be completed after the snom ONE restart I then rebooted the PBX (but have not tried rebooting the SoHo, yet) and found that the upgrade failed, when I checked under the Status tab. Is this entry, the culprit?: [5] The type is not executable for file audio_moh/bi_ced.wav FYI I created symbolic links to the audio folders under the snom ONE working directory, e.g. audio_moh -> /mnt/usb/audio_moh Thanks!

The page has been deleted or moved. Do you have an updated link?

Great catch! And it did... the log shows that the PBX is now receiving packets from CallCentric and, under the Domain/Trunks tab, the registration status is 200 Ok. Thanks!

I know nothing about the world of masks; I was simply following the instructions on the CallCentric website: If you have a secured/restricted network and need to know the ports and IP addresses to allow for Callcentric then please use the information below. NOTE: In general ports 5060-5080 should be allowed in order to properly communicate with the Callcentric servers. Users experiencing audio issues may want to check that RTP audio is not blocked by their firewall configuration: IP addresses/Networks 204.11.192.0/22 OR 204.11.192.0 - 204.11.192.255 At my home-office, I get broadband through AT&T U-verse. When I log onto my U-verse router's config page, it reads: Broadband link type: Built-in modem - vDSL Connection type: Direct IP IP address: xx.xxx.xxx.6 Subnet mask: 255.255.254.0 Default Gateway: xx.xxx.xxx.1 --- What do you suggest I do?

Name: VoIP.ms Type: SIP Registration Direction: I/O Trunk Destination: Generic SIP Server State: Enabled Display Name: YOUR NAME Account: VoIP.ms acct. # Domain: chicago.voip.ms [or the local VoIP.ms server of your choice] Username: VoIP.ms acct. # Proxy Address: SAME AS DOMAIN Proposed Duration: 120 Keepalive Time: BLANK Diversion Header: Default(RFC) Remote Party: RFC3325 (P-Asserted-Identity) Rewrite global numbers: NANPA (11 digits) Avoid RFC4122 (UUID): No Generate unique extension identifier: No Interpret SIP URI always as telephone number: Yes Caller ID update on trunk: SIP INFO Is Secure: Yes Explicitly list addresses for inbound traffic: SAME AS DOMAIN & PROXY ADDRESS Codec Preference: G.711U; G.729A Lock codec: Yes Strict RTP Routing: No Trunk requires out of band-DTMF tones: No Requires busy tone detection: No Ringback(Support early media): Media Force local ringback: No

Under the Web Page Control tab, I edited the reg_access.htm page to add the following subnets: 255.255.254.0 & 255.255.252.0. In doing so, I made sure to retain the formatting and, thus, entered: <option value="23">255.255.254.0</option> <option value="22">255.255.252.0</option> I wanted to add the 23-bit subnet for my home-office public IP and needed the 22-bit for CallCentric's IP address block. In the routing table (SoHo), I deleted the LAN default gateway and added static entries to my home office & to CallCentric's network. I then created, in the IP Access Control list, a block entry as follows: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 [Everything else]. I've been following the log and it appears as though snom ONE is able to transmit to CallCentric just fine; but no SIP Rx entries are showing up from CallCentric. In addition, despite specifically allowing my home-office's & CallCentric's IP blocks, snom ONE still Blacklisted both--until I added an allow entry of x.x.x.x/32 for my home office. In order to get the PBX to register to CallCentric, again, I had to delete the "block 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0" entry. When editing reg_access.htm to add subnets, do I need to do the same somewhere else on the PBX? Or, is this a bug in v4.5.0.1090 (snom ONE mini)--running on a SoHo? Or am I simply missing something, here?

I've noticed for several weeks the following entry, in the snom ONE log: UDP: recvfrom 124.59.84.0:49218 returns EAGAIN It appears to be happening about twice per second, w/several entries to the effect of: Last message repeated 33 times After a WHOis search, it appears to be a China IP address. So, I then added the following entry into the Access List: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0; but the same entries as above keep showing up in the log, although the IP address will change throughout the day. Is this something to worry about?

Will the same hold true for the SoHo?

Something else, weird, happened yesterday. snom ONE blacklisted one of CallCentric's IP addresses, despite the fact that I specifically permitted access to the PBX to CallCentric's block of IP address (as shown above). The attachment to the e-mail from the system, notifying me of the blacklisted IP address, contained the following: BYE sip:204.11.192.164:5060;ua=fd1d275ae76edf1dc91c85c8b1ab11ae SIP/2.0 v: SIP/2.0/UDP 204.11.192.164:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-a49aeb427dcc684611d20e5bfb9523b5;change=ta f: "Cell Phone WI" <sip:16082890039@204.11.192.132:5074>;tag=as3c8b6d05 t: <sip:18159862626@callcentric.com>;tag=360ead15d4 i: 6f540dd362e2e4a105380648588aca31@204.11.192.132 CSeq: 103 BYE Max-Forwards: 70 l: 0 What am I missing here?

I found it, here: http://www.callcentric.com/faq/9#254

What are the chances of having this feature added in the next update/release? Do I need to round up more people to request this; or who do we need to bribe around here?

I did as instructed and CallCentric came back. Being conscious of the troubles CallCentric has been experiencing recently, I tried this over a few days--and, each time, within seconds of deleting the [iP Address] 0.0.0.0 [Netmask] 0.0.0.0 entry, CallCentric would come back. Then, when I went back to the IP Access Control page & added [iP Address] 0.0.0.0 [Netmask] 0.0.0.0 and then checked under the Domain/Trunks tab, CallCentric (almost immediately) returned a persistent 408 Request Timeout. Any thoughts?

Are there best practices re: the number of ITSPs or SIP trunks? To date, I've relied on two trunks: (1) PSTN gateway w/an SPA3000 and (2) SIP registration via CallCentric. I only have 1 hardline, so I've been relying heavily on CallCentric for inbound calls (especially given their unlimited incoming minutes for a low monthly rate). Unfortunately, CallCentric has recently been on the receiving end of some nasty DoS attacks that brought their service to a screeching halt for days. So, I've started exploring other ITSPs to use as a back-up and have come across the following three: (1) VoipVoip; (2) Flowroute; (3) Vitelity? What are some of your experiences w/any of these ITSPs and/or do you have other recommendations? RE: My first Q., do businesses usually stick to one ITSP or is it a good idea to have accounts w/multiple ITSPs?

My IP Access List current reads as follows: IP Address Type [Comment] 204.11.192.0/22 Allow [CallCentric] 1xx.xxx.xxx.0/23 Allow [u-verse] 192.168.2.0/24 Allow [LAN] 127.0.0.1/32 Allow [localhost] 69.90.209.57/32 Allow [VoipVoip] 99.xxx.xxx.xxx/32 Allow [Home Office] In trying to block "everything else," I add the following entry: [iP address] 0.0.0.0 [Netmask] 0.0.0.0 [Type] Block However, when I do so, my CallCentric trunk's registration drops and I receive continuous 408 errors. What am I doing wrong? Thanks!

Is the snom ONE SoHo PoE compatible?

RE: the 5 greetings that can be associated w/an Extension Mailbox. Is it possible to link the various greetings to Service Flags (similar to the way an Auto Attendant has a built-in IVR that can accommodate 5 separate announcements/greetings)? How about direct dialing into a specific Extension Mailbox greeting, e.g. 840*3?

I want to create a scheduled (Day/Night) Service Flag that will automatically activate on the U.S. federal holidays listed on the U.S. Postal Service website ( http://about.usps.com/news/events-calendar/2012-federal-holidays.htm ) so I can link it to the Auto Attendant IVR and direct callers to a 'message only' holiday greeting. In setting up such a SF, I selected the Day/Night mode, but I'm confused as to what to type in the Description fields. After reading the wiki article on SFs ( http://wiki.snomone.com/index.php?title=Service_Flags#Setting_up_a_Service_Flag_Account ), it appears as though the SF will not be active if I type 1/2 1/16 2/20 5/28 7/4 9/3 10/8 11/12 11/22 12/25 into the Holidays field. Is that correct? If so, does that mean I have to manually type in every non-holiday date of the year into the Holidays field, e.g. 1/2 1/3 1/4 1/5 1/6 ... 12/31?

Is it possible to set a 2nd language on an Agent Group (similar to an Auto Attendant)? Here's the set-up I'm trying to configure: Office has 1 main phone #; calls first go to an Auto Attendant that says "Thank you for calling the office of X. Please remain on the line and your call will be connected shortly. Para continuar en Español por favor oprime el numero 1." On the Auto Attendant, I have set up Service Flags for (i) Business-hours; (ii) After-hours; and (iii) Holiday greetings. In addition, on the AA, I configured the Direct Destinations as follows: (Line 1) User input = F; no playback; (Destination) numerical fax ext.; (Line 2) User input = 1; no playback; (Destination) 57 (which is what I want to be a Spanish-language Agent Group). Lastly, the Redirect Timeout, in the AA, is set to transfer the caller to ext. 55 (an English-language Agent Group). I have both audio_en and audio_sp installed in /usr/local/snomONE. I copied the ringback.wav and busy.wav files from the audio_en into the audio_sp folder. On the snom ONE wiki I read that .wav files w/a pb_ prefix are acd-related files. I then looked in the audio_sp folder and noticed that it has the same pb_*.wav files as the audio_en folder, albeit, the pb_*.wav files in the audio_sp folder are in Spanish. So, it appears as though all the pieces are there to have an Agent Group play a language different than the default domain language (which, in my case, is English). After snooping around the /usr/local/snomONE, I can not find an .xml file or otherwise that tells the system to play the pb_*.wav files from the audio_en folder. (I was looking for this b/c I thought I could simply modify the script--or whatever-- to look for the same files in the audio_sp folder for the Spanish-language Agent Group). Any ideas on how I can accomplish this (I'm definitely open to a different workaround as well)? Thanks! -Pablo

This web page: http://wiki.snomone.com/index.php?title=Snom_ONE_TSP has a dead link: http://downloads.snom.net/snomONE/modules/SnomOne32Tsp203.zip Is the 32-bit version available for download from a different site?

Great... and now this just happened to me: Office PBX (via e-mail): The IP address 99.111.114.6 has been blacklistedfor 60 minutes because there were 4 unsuccessful authentication attempts (sip). REGISTER sip:pbx.pcatty.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 99.111.114.6:4331;branch=z9hG4bK-hdfa3ht34r9m;rport From: "Home" <sip:74@pbx.pcatty.com>;tag=spk2aw804n To: "Home" <sip:74@pbx.pcatty.com> Call-ID: 506de7c5b4e0-e0sqhzf3x6ye CSeq: 1 REGISTER Max-Forwards: 70 Contact: <sip:74@99.111.114.6:4331;transport=tls;line=4fvqnifv>;q=1.0;reg-id=1;+sip.instance="<urn:uuid:30f947f2-2522-4545-8c59-000413297E34>";audio;mobility="fixed";duplex="full";description="snom360";actor="principal";events="dialog";methods="INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,REFER,OPTIONS,NOTIFY,SUBSCRIBE,PRACK,MESSAGE,INFO" User-Agent: snom360/8.7.3.10 Allow-Events: dialog X-Real-IP: 99.111.114.6 Supported: path, gruu Expires: 3600 Content-Length: 0 This is after I, earlier today, added my network to the Access List: 99.111.114.0/23 (my home office). Any ideas on what could possibly going on?

I went ahead and upgraded the SoHo via the Software Update url under the System Tab. Under the Status tab, the version displayed is: 4.5.0.1090 Epsilon Geminids (snom ONE mini). On the phone's log, there's an entry that reads: 4/10/2012 15:15:37 [NOTICE] PHN: Fetching URL: http://pbx.pcatty.co...nom360 4/10/2012 15:15:38 [iNFO ] PHN: WEBCLIENT: redirect (http://pbx.pcatty.co...l?model=snom360) to (http://login.htm:80) Why is the phone trying to redirect to http://login.htm:80? Could this be the problem, b/c further down in the phone's log, I found: 4/10/2012 15:15:40 [DEBUG0] DNS: Not adding empty response for a login.htm (ttl=900) 4/10/2012 15:15:40 [ALERT ] PHN: webclient: Could not resolve host during provisioning login.htm 4/10/2012 15:15:40 [NOTICE] PHN: Config setup: return code 400; requeueing >http://login.htm:80<; attempt: 1, state: 29 4/10/2012 15:15:43 [NOTICE] PHN: Fetching URL: http://login.htm:80 ... 4/10/2012 15:15:45 [DEBUG0] DNS: Not adding empty response for a login.htm (ttl=900) 4/10/2012 15:15:45 [ALERT ] PHN: webclient: Could not resolve host during provisioning login.htm 4/10/2012 15:15:45 [NOTICE] PHN: Config setup: return code 400; requeueing >http://login.htm:80<; attempt: 2, state: 29 4/10/2012 15:15:48 [NOTICE] PHN: Fetching URL: http://login.htm:80 ... 4/10/2012 15:15:49 [DEBUG0] DNS: Not adding empty response for a login.htm (ttl=900) 4/10/2012 15:15:49 [ALERT ] PHN: webclient: Could not resolve host during provisioning login.htm 4/10/2012 15:15:49 [NOTICE] PHN: Config setup: return code 400; requeueing >http://login.htm:80<; attempt: 3, state: 29 4/10/2012 15:15:52 [NOTICE] PHN: Fetching URL: http://login.htm:80 ... 4/10/2012 15:15:54 [DEBUG0] DNS: Not adding empty response for a login.htm (ttl=900) 4/10/2012 15:15:54 [ALERT ] PHN: webclient: Could not resolve host during provisioning login.htm 4/10/2012 15:15:54 [NOTICE] PHN: Config setup: return code 400; requeueing >http://login.htm:80<; attempt: 4, state: 29 4/10/2012 15:15:57 [NOTICE] PHN: Fetching URL: http://login.htm:80 ... 4/10/2012 15:15:58 [DEBUG0] DNS: Not adding empty response for a login.htm (ttl=900) 4/10/2012 15:15:58 [ALERT ] PHN: webclient: Could not resolve host during provisioning login.htm 4/10/2012 15:15:58 [NOTICE] PHN: Config setup: return code 400; requeueing >http://login.htm:80<; attempt: 5, state: 29 4/10/2012 15:16:01 [NOTICE] PHN: Fetching URL: http://login.htm:80 ... 4/10/2012 15:16:03 [DEBUG0] DNS: Not adding empty response for a login.htm (ttl=900) 4/10/2012 15:16:03 [ALERT ] PHN: webclient: Could not resolve host during provisioning login.htm 4/10/2012 15:16:03 [NOTICE] PHN: Config setup: return code 400; giving up on >http://login.htm:80<Why is the phone looking for http://login.htm:80? Given that the phone is being set up in a remote site, should the phone not be trying to redirect to http://pbx.pcatty.com/login.htm:80?

In my office, I had snom ONE running on Windows 7 (64-bit) for several months w/one remote phone (in home office). I was able to work around NAT issues by following the route-table instructions in wiki article; the remote phone auto provisioned; and everything worked wonderfully. I recently purchased snom SoHo, to swap out Windows 7 machine and now I cannot get the remote phone (snom 360) to auto-provision. I've retraced my steps, over and over, to make sure that I did not inadvertently change/modify anything else when I deployed the snom SoHo; and I can not find a solution. In the office, my snom 300 is able to auto-provision w/o any issues (just like it did w/the Win7 machine). Log from PBX: [5] 2012/10/04 00:25:42:Did not write snom_360.xml to file system because there is no user associated with this file [5] 2012/10/04 00:28:30:Last message repeated 2 times [8] 2012/10/04 00:28:30:PnP: Using the credentials of 45@pbx.pcatty.com for file snom_3xx.xml Log from phone: 4/10/2012 05:28:27 [NOTICE] PHN: Setting server prio 1, type redirection, url: >http://pbx.pcatty.com/prov/snom360.htm<4/10/2012 05:28:27 [NOTICE] PHN: Fetching URL: http://pbx.pcatty.com:80/prov/snom360.htm4/10/2012 05:28:29 [NOTICE] LID: Opening TCP socket on port 75474/10/2012 05:28:29 [NOTICE] LID: Opening TCP socket on port 8434/10/2012 05:28:29 [FATAL ] PHN: Phone::uboot_version:1.1.3-s4/10/2012 05:28:29 [NOTICE] PHN: read_xml_settings: found setting-files XML header4/10/2012 05:28:29 [NOTICE] PHN: read_xml_settings: found one byte encoding: 14/10/2012 05:28:29 [NOTICE] PHN: read_setting_file_list: added URL: http://pbx.pcatty.com:80/snom_3xx_fw.xml?model=snom3604/10/2012 05:28:29 [NOTICE] PHN: read_setting_file_list: added URL: https://pbx.pcatty.com:443/snom_3xx_phone.xml?model=snom3604/10/2012 05:28:29 [NOTICE] PHN: read_setting_file_list: added URL: https://pbx.pcatty.com:443/snom_3xx_fkeys.xml?model=snom3604/10/2012 05:28:29 [NOTICE] PHN: read_setting_file_list: added URL: https://pbx.pcatty.com:443/snom_web_lang.xml?model=snom3604/10/2012 05:28:29 [NOTICE] PHN: read_setting_file_list: added URL: https://pbx.pcatty.com:443/snom_gui_lang.xml?model=snom3604/10/2012 05:28:29 [NOTICE] PHN: Config setup: found xml style settings4/10/2012 05:28:29 [NOTICE] PHN: last prov successful:1; uri: >http://pbx.pcatty.com/prov/snom360.htm<; default uri: >http://provisioning.snom.com/snom360/snom360.php?mac={mac}<4/10/2012 05:28:29 [NOTICE] PHN: Fetching URL: http://pbx.pcatty.com:80/prov/snom360-000413297E34.htm4/10/2012 05:28:30 [NOTICE] PHN: webclient::handle_challenge: http server is asking for credentials!4/10/2012 05:28:30 [NOTICE] PHN: webclient::handle_challenge: resending request !4/10/2012 05:28:30 [NOTICE] PHN: read_xml_settings: found setting-files XML header4/10/2012 05:28:30 [NOTICE] PHN: read_xml_settings: found one byte encoding: 14/10/2012 05:28:30 [NOTICE] PHN: Config setup: found xml style settings4/10/2012 05:28:30 [NOTICE] PHN: last prov successful:1; uri: >http://pbx.pcatty.com/prov/snom360.htm<; default uri: >http://provisioning.snom.com/snom360/snom360.php?mac={mac}<4/10/2012 05:28:30 [NOTICE] PHN: Fetching URL: http://pbx.pcatty.com:80/snom_3xx_fw.xml?model=snom3604/10/2012 05:28:32 [ALERT ] PHN: webclient: Could not resolve host during provisioning login.htm4/10/2012 05:28:32 [NOTICE] PHN: Config setup: return code 400; requeueing >http://login.htm:80<; attempt: 1, state: 294/10/2012 05:28:35 [NOTICE] PHN: Fetching URL: http://login.htm:804/10/2012 05:28:37 [ALERT ] PHN: webclient: Could not resolve host during provisioning login.htm4/10/2012 05:28:37 [NOTICE] PHN: Config setup: return code 400; requeueing >http://login.htm:80<; attempt: 2, state: 294/10/2012 05:28:40 [NOTICE] PHN: Fetching URL: http://login.htm:804/10/2012 05:28:42 [NOTICE] PHN: TPL: Socket 16 idle/connect timeout4/10/2012 05:28:42 [ALERT ] PHN: webclient: Could not resolve host during provisioning login.htm4/10/2012 05:28:42 [NOTICE] PHN: Config setup: return code 400; requeueing >http://login.htm:80<; attempt: 3, state: 294/10/2012 05:28:45 [NOTICE] PHN: Fetching URL: http://login.htm:804/10/2012 05:28:46 [NOTICE] PHN: TPL: Socket 19 idle/connect timeout4/10/2012 05:28:46 [ALERT ] PHN: webclient: Could not resolve host during provisioning login.htm4/10/2012 05:28:46 [NOTICE] PHN: Config setup: return code 400; requeueing >http://login.htm:80<; attempt: 4, state: 294/10/2012 05:28:49 [NOTICE] PHN: Fetching URL: http://login.htm:804/10/2012 05:28:49 [NOTICE] PHN: TPL: Socket 20 idle/connect timeout4/10/2012 05:28:51 [NOTICE] PHN: TPL: Socket 23 idle/connect timeout4/10/2012 05:28:51 [ALERT ] PHN: webclient: Could not resolve host during provisioning login.htm4/10/2012 05:28:51 [NOTICE] PHN: Config setup: return code 400; requeueing >http://login.htm:80<; attempt: 5, state: 294/10/2012 05:28:54 [NOTICE] PHN: Fetching URL: http://login.htm:804/10/2012 05:28:54 [NOTICE] PHN: TPL: Socket 24 idle/connect timeout4/10/2012 05:28:55 [NOTICE] PHN: TPL: Socket 27 idle/connect timeout4/10/2012 05:28:55 [ALERT ] PHN: webclient: Could not resolve host during provisioning login.htm4/10/2012 05:28:55 [NOTICE] PHN: Config setup: return code 400; giving up on >http://login.htm:80<4/10/2012 05:28:55 [NOTICE] PHN: Skipping prio 2 setting server, type pnp, url: ><4/10/2012 05:28:55 [NOTICE] PHN: Skipping prio 3 setting server, type dhcp, url: ><4/10/2012 05:28:55 [NOTICE] PHN: Skipping prio 4 setting server, type tr69, url: >< Any, and all, ideas will be greatly appreciated!