lionel

Ok i'm trying this.

I'm ok with this. It's why i've forbidenn G729A codec in my config. But why i've this type of message in my logs? I don't use this codec.

Hi, i've a lot of message in my log for call state in alerting. I'm worry, because during certain break communication if i search in the log, this message is associated. What is this state? Best regards

Hi, i've many message with call limit reached on my logs. I've forbiden g729a codec. And i've a trunk with 8 calls. My licence is ok for 10 calls. I don't understand why i see this type of message If anyone have an idea. i'm interesting. Sorry for my poor english. best regards

Ok, i confirme what i've understood. For trunk with my provider, i must declare it like a global and accept redirect. Obviously i've one domain. No risk to be billed by my provider for bad redirection?

It was what i don't want to do. Only if i can accept refer only for a list of domain like "fai.fr mydomain etc" i want not accept abuse refer demand.

hi, i've a problem with My sip gateway's provider who use a communigate server. when i call another phone who use the same provider and the called phone try to transfer call, my snomone receive a refer from communigate like this: REFER sip:trunk@1.1.1.1:5060;transport=udp;maddr=1.1.1.1 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 2.2.2.2:5060;branch=z9hG4bK927820-jizasgv;cgp=fai.fr;rport P-CGP-Identity: grp_csctechnique@fai.eu Max-Forwards: 70 From: <sip:0101010101@myname.fai.eu>;tag=3017C508-247538-F740CEED_jizasgv-7039 To: "0202020202" <sip:trunk@myname.fai.eu>;tag=8371 Call-ID: 1fbd8d80@pbx Contact: <sip:signode-247538-F740CEED_jizasgv-7039@2.2.2.2>from communigate CSeq: 1 REFER Refer-To: <sip:fwd_grp_csctechdebordement@fai.eu> Referred-By: <sip:0101010101@myname.fai.eu>;tag=3017C508-247538-F740CEED_jizasgv-7039 User-Agent: CommuniGatePro-callLeg/5.4.3 Refer-Cookie: 0 Content-Length: 0 [9] 20130708154717: Resolve 69689: aaaa udp 2.2.2.2 5060 [9] 20130708154717: Resolve 69689: a udp 2.2.2.2 5060 [9] 20130708154717: Resolve 69689: udp 2.2.2.2 5060 [5] 20130708154717: SIP Tx udp:2.2.2.2:5060: SIP/2.0 202 Accepted Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 2.2.2.2:5060;branch=z9hG4bK927820-jizasgv;cgp=fai.fr;rport=5060 From: <sip:0101010101@myname.fai.eu>;tag=3017C508-247538-F740CEED_jizasgv-7039 To: "0202020202" <sip:trunk@mayname.fai.eu>;tag=8371 Call-ID: 1fbd8d80@pbx CSeq: 1 REFER Contact: <sip:trunk@1.1.1.1:5060;transport=udp> User-Agent: snomONE/5.0.5 Content-Length: 0 But my snomone refuse this transfer and the communication close. I've this message from my snomone juste after the previous REFER message. [5] 20130708154717: Redirecting call to fwd_grp_csctechdebordement [5] 20130708154717: REFER without a valid extension is not accepted on trunk 2 28 [8] 20130708154717: call port 316: state code from 200 to 486 [9] 20130708154717: Resolve 69690: url sip:2.2.2.2:5060;lr [9] 20130708154717: Resolve 69690: udp 2.2.2.2 5060 [5] 20130708154717: SIP Tx udp:2.2.2.2:5060: BYE sip:signode-247538-F740CEED_jizasgv-7039@2.2.2.2 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.1.1.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-63aaa6edf966bb591d41b190f31c54ba;rport Route: <sip:2.2.2.2:5060;lr> Route: <sip:1.1.1.2:5060;lr> Route: <sip:41051517-1.1.1.2.dialog.cgatepro;lr> From: "0202020202" <sip:trunk@myname.fai.eu>;tag=8371 To: <sip:0101010101@myname.fai.eu>;tag=3017C508-247538-F740CEED_jizasgv-7039 Call-ID: 1fbd8d80@pbx CSeq: 12281 BYE Max-Forwards: 70 Contact: <sip:trunk@1.1.1.1:5060;transport=udp> P-Asserted-Identity: "trunk name" <sip:trunk@myname.fai.eu> Remote-Party-ID: "lastname firstname" <sip:0202020202@pbx2.mydomain;user=phone> P-Charging-Vector: icid-value=;icid-generated-at=178.255.164.213;orig-ioi=pbx2.mydomain Authorization: Digest realm="fai.fr",nonce="243F307A82B9FB4F930B",response="7309a8112abbd0ae48c3c633df1ce1f5",username="trunk",uri="sip:signode-247538-F740CEED_jizasgv-7039@2.2.2.2",qop="auth",nc=00000003,cnonce="a71d51c5",opaque="opaq",algorithm=MD5 Content-Length: 0 My provider can't change his configuration. How can modify snomone to resolve this problem. I don't want to allow tranfer on my trunk, or olny for one domain name like "fai.fr." Best regards

Sorry i don't understand what you want to explain me i've tested with the attached file paste in a folder html that i ve created but the problem is the same only the last extension is set can you give me the good process to provision multi-account on m9r?

The provisionning server is my snomone: http://ipbxaddress/prov/snom-m9-macaddres.xml the base and the server is on the same lan, no dhcp configure, no broadcast pnp. i tried with the first extension as http client, and without information in http client on my configuration who works with a snomone v5.0.5, it's ok without http client in security parmaters of m9r

on the v 5.0.5 there's for each extension a generated file who have the 4 extensions idx1, idx2, etc on the v 5.0.10a there's a generated file only for the last extension who has the mac adress bind, and thre's only his extension set in xml file

Hi, i've configure mac address of my base on 4 extensions on my snomone, but only one extension is set automaticaly as first identity on m9r base. How can set automaticaly the 3 others? all other parameters of provisionning are ok on the base. with snomone v5.0.5, i've not this problem. i think, there's a problem with the generated files on v 5.0.10a who have only the last extension with mac adress binded and not the 3 others.

Thanks for answer. I would check the new version as soon as the language package will also be in version 5.0.4. Maybe you can let old link for version 5.0.3. it will be easier for other user. Best regards

Hi, i've installed the new version 5.0.4, but i can't change blank adim password. When i look to logfile, i can read admin password change. I test logout, restart, stop and start. But i can't change this default blanck password. I've tested this on windows xp (x86) and w7 (x64). It's the same problem. I've testes too with ie and firefox. With ie i've many debug windows when i use it. With firefox, no problem, except the admin password who doesn't want to change. I hope someone can explain this to me. EDIT: the problem is due to a bug for v5.0.4, i test with v5.0.3 and i've not the problem another pb: langage prompt links are for v5.0.3 and cause a update error with v5.0.4 maybe snom can test a little more his version before to do online version..