Juan Manuel Acevedo

Thanks Maribel, when can I to find the way to use it? Juan

Hi: For PSTN I use Quintum gateways wich I can configure to drive one incoming call to one account, (extension,group, AA) based on called party or calling party. (DNIS or ANI) I need to use a SIP registration Trunk to one ITSP wich give me several numbers. I need to drive the call based on the called party as well based on calling party, but I don´t see at trunk definition any parameter to do that. It is possible or not?, If yes how can I to configure it? Thanks and best regards- Juan Acevedo consultorit@umi.com.co

Thanks for the answer, in fact I need is that when extension is not registered, the calls be forwarded to one specific extension, but the default behavior of PBxNSIP is that when the extension is not registered and a call is incoming it goes to the vmail. The point is that my csatomer uses Softphone and when he turn off the PC, the extension loses the register, and he want that teh call goes to another extension.

Hi: Does exist some way to redirect the extension when it is not registered but dedfined at PBXnSIP? A lot of my customers use Softphone and when they power off the PC, the extension get not register, and they want that when it happens the call goes to another extension. Of course exists the option for forward alls calls and the customer has the option to do that before power off, but.. you now : Alzaimer exists.

Thanks for your answer, but how can I do that Pulver get a session border controller?

Hi: I have downloaded Version 2.1.6.2450, but I don't see room to configure STUN Server, and my provider, Pulver rejects the registration becuase non-routable addresss. Any body knows how to configure it? Thanks And Best Regards Juan Acevedo consultorit@umi.com.co

Hi: I see a lot of expired files (18.000 per day) recorded at PBX folder, I dont know why these files are produced niether how to avoid his recording. The fact is that in a PBXnSIP with a large number of calls the existence of these files make waste a lot of processor resources making inestable the system. If anybody knows how to avoid them please tell me. Best regards and thanks Juan Manuel Acevedo acevedo1@une.net.co

Hi: Does anybody know SIP phones with two ports autosensing 100/1000? Better if are tested with PBXnSIP. Thanks Juan Acevedo acevedo1@une.net.co

Paul: Can you test with 2.1.6.2447? I have pasted twice and the license is not recognize Thanks Juan Acevedo

I have installed the 2.1.6.2447, but the license was not activated. I use a Wireless NIC in order to provide the server with the MAC address, but the license was not activated. The 2.0.3.1715 version, the last I am using activates the license with the wireless NIC. What can I do? I want to use the 2.1.6.2447 because the new features it has. Anybody can give some idea? Thanks Juan Acevedo acevedo1@une.net.co

Thanks, using a higher priority for for the next entry failover it works fine, it can not be the same or less Juan Acevedo acevedo1@une.net.co

Hi: It seems trunk I have the following settings: Dial plan: 9* 9* to trunk119, failover on 5xx codes, and request timeout 5 secs 9* 9* to trunk120 Trunks: trunk119: SIP Gateway outbound: 192.168.2.119 trunk120: SIP Gateway outbound: 192.168.2.120 I have populate all the channels of the gateway 119, and make a new call starting by 9, at ethereal I can see that PBXnSIP returns 503 error. but dont search the trunk 120, and returns bussy tone at phone originates the call. I will appreciate any help about. Thanks and best regards

Hi: I use one wireless NIC in order to provide the MAC address to the system, this way I can mover to one server to another por backup purposes. I see at V2.1.5 that the system does not recognize the wireless NIC MAC , It recognizes only the MAC of the wired NIC included at server. Thanks Juan Acevedo email: acevedo1@une.net.co