Steno
-
Posts
7 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Steno
-
-
Not really sure how and why, but it seemed to work for only 1 phone, so that cannot be it either.
We now upgraded the SnomONE to latest beta (103) and it worked with 8.4.35 also.
So problem 1 is solved, onsite PNp works
Now going to try over VPN with authentication
Not sure if I should put sipuser@pbx.company.com or just sipuser At least for now it seems not to work.
Phone and SnomONE do talk to eachother, but keep getting
[5] 27/3/2012 05:41:33: Update: Fetching FW URL: 10.0.1.4:80//snom370/snom370-firmware.htm done, result 302
provisioning the M9 seems to work already, only wondering if I can assign a specific handset to an account, or that it will be assigned at random.
-
Hmm looks like a firmware issue in 8.4.35
Just tried 8.4.18 and it seemed to work (however also wanted to try a beta one and the got kinda mixed up, so I only briefly saw it become registered)
Double checking now.
-
YUp I already figured out that part, that it THINKS it is not assigned, however it is
-
Hi,
I just noticed the autentication problem in the Phone. However they ARE in the same LAN/subnet/DHCP
I 'm doing a fully logged restart now
[9] 2012/03/27 14:10:31:
HTTP 10.0.1.12:1030: [5c9413bd] send_finished(13250901f77649da6aab2d3f)
[8] 2012/03/27 14:10:31:
HTTP: Received request for file snom370-0004133A5837.htm from 10.0.1.12
[9] 2012/03/27 14:10:31:
HTTP: Trust MAC address is set to true
[8] 2012/03/27 14:10:31:
HTTP: extracted MAC address 0004133A5837 for IP 10.0.1.12 from ARP table
[8] 2012/03/27 14:10:31:
HTTP: finding snom370-0004133A5837.htm for vendor snom, MAC 0004133A5837
[8] 2012/03/27 14:10:31:
HTTP: MAC 0004133A5837 is not assigned to any extension. Look for auth info.
-
Hi and thanks,
Yup, already seen that one. Looks like my router(s) don't have a SHCP option 66, but that's not my problem on the mainlocation. There it doesn't work at all.
I could work with DHCP from the server, however I don't think that would bring me much benefit, since that also would not work for the sub-locations, only for main. There are only servers on the main location.
I mainly want to focus to get the locally provisioning to work, because when that works, I can do the other location "manually" through chancing the PnP server. That also does not work now. because of the errors "Did not write..."
-
Hi,
I can't seem to get auto provisioning working.
I have
- Snom One,
- DHCP from the router
- Snom 300 & 370 Phones
- created some extensions with MAC address
And I always get these messages:
Did not write snom_300.xml to file system because there is no user associated with this file
Did not write snom_370.xml to file system because there is no user associated with this file
When I do not add a MAC address it does work, but gives me one extension I do not want, because the phones are user-specific and I'd like to deploy out of the box based on MAC.
Second question:
if above should and does work, then it would also be possible to do the same over VPN I guess?!
Only thing to make sure is that multicast works over the VPN?
Auto provisioning
in General Setup
Posted
OK, thanks for all the help.
On-site provisioning: Works great
Off-site VPN provisioning works now manually (I had indeed the wrong syntax, although it was very clear in the manua/wiki)
M9 provisioning for multiple handsets: kind of a challenge, I re-wrote the settings.xml voor de main/provsioning extension to include the MAC address of the DECT (IPUI) which I put into "Trusted IP" address. This works! wooh!
It however would be better to not abuse this trusted IP-address field for this. Can I use Parameter1 field? What would be the dynamic name for this?
Suggestion: Create a field voor de IPUI parameter.