Jump to content
Vodia PBX forum

netpro78

Members
  • Content Count

    59
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About netpro78

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

763 profile views
  1. netpro78

    Graphics not loading

    With the latest version of your website going live, it appears that you have accidentally deleted images that the PBX uses in the emails it generates for example: https://vodia.com/img/welcomeheader.jpg
  2. netpro78

    Shared Mailbox Access

    Good catch, this specific machine was still on the Aug 27 build.
  3. netpro78

    Shared Mailbox Access

    In the testing of the new feature of "assign to the user that first opens the message" on win64 61.1 the setting keeps turning itself off even after it is turned on, and save is pressed
  4. netpro78

    Spam Scoring

    Now that SPAM scoring seems to be working in my test environment, I am testing the various options for the "Handling of suspected SPAM" calls field. the options of "Reject Call", and "Pretend to be busy" seem to do the exact same thing. They both say we are sorry, but this extension does not accept anonymous calls. The problem with this is that they both clue the caller in that some sort of ANI filtering is going on since the caller is probably aware that they are not sending anonymous. I would suggest that pretend to be busy sends the call directly to Voicemail, and reject the call sends a reorder tone to the caller (500, or 486). The other two options seem to work as you would expect.
  5. netpro78

    Spam Scoring

    It seems to have fixed the issue in my test environment.
  6. netpro78

    Spam Scoring

    I just attempted to download the latest 61.1 Win 64 version, and it is still showing a build date of Aug 27, and exhibits the same TrueCNAM behavior
  7. netpro78

    Spam Scoring

    I created a new domain from scratch to eliminate any of the problems you mentioned of changing settings after the fact. The problem still exists that if you allow the PBX to manipulate the numbers by entering a country code as you suggested, there is no way to have a 11 digit DNIS, and 10 digit ANI on the same trunk. All of my tests have been domestic, so I would imagine it would be even more problematic if I started testing internationally. The PBX doing any manipulation of numbers without the full control of the user is going to prove to be problematic.
  8. netpro78

    Shared Mailbox Access

    I have had the mb_min_dur value set to 2 seconds, and the person left a 90 second voicemail, and the logfile still showed: [5] 20180831215020: Voicemail from to too short, discarding it [5] 20180831215020: Voice mail message 65162 may be too short, not sending MWI I am wondering if this was a random problem that was happening back in 56.1 that may have since been fixed The mailbox is very busy, so it may only happen 1 out of 100 voicemails.
  9. netpro78

    Spam Scoring

    Would it not make more sense to be transparent to the end user, and instead of the PBX rewriting anything, the default would be that noting would be rewritten, and if the user wanted certain things rewritten, they would have the option to write their own regular expression(s) to do so? This allows an unlimited number of combinations such as trunks to different countries with differently formatted DIDs all in the same domain.
  10. netpro78

    Shared Mailbox Access

    I now potentially have a second reason to upgrade to this version to get this new feature. I have been starting to get complaints of missing messages. I turned on recording to track them down. The call recording confirms the messages are being left, however they are not getting them. I dug through the logfile to find that after the recording was complete it stated: [5] 20180831215020: Voicemail from to too short, discarding it [5] 20180831215020: Voice mail message 65162 may be too short, not sending MWI this was despite the voicemail system at the domain level was set to not have a minimum recording duration. I just wanted to make sure that this issue had been addressed post 56.1 Win 64 to make sure I will not be doing 2 upgrades back to back.
  11. netpro78

    Spam Scoring

    Thought the development of this product, I cannot think of one one feature that has proven more problematic than the country code. The problem is the PBX tries to guess how you want to rewrite things. It has only caused issues, and outages as upgrades have happened since it's behavior had changed so frequently from version to version. Many years back someone in support recommended that I not use it, and enter everything into the pbx exactly as the carrier expected it. This solved all of my issues over the years, and occasionally I would test using using the country code again, and it would just reintroduce problems. Currently I put it back in, and it fixed the spam scoring, however broke outgoing calling since it would send 10 digits instead of 11 (despite rewriting in the dialplan), so I switched the trunk to 11 digits and it broke the ANI since I have a carrier that expects 11 digits of DNIS, but 10 digits of ANI. So now I am in a tough position that the PBX is rewriting the SPAM ANI despite my best efforts to get it to not manipulate anything
  12. netpro78

    Spam Scoring

    I found it, thanks for the pointer, I always forget about all of the settings that are available when editing the domain. However now that I am testing it for the first time, I am calling in with a known spam number in order to see the different ways that the PBX can reject the call. TrueCNAM scores 2027537878 at 100. However with the threshold set at 50 it was not getting rejected. I tool a look in the logging, and it appears all of the digits were not being submitted to TrueCNAM even though the number showed up properly in the invite, and the call logs. resp_type=extended&resp_format=json&calling_number=027537878 I am on version 61.0.2 Win64
  13. netpro78

    Shared Mailbox Access

    Thanks, that is appreciated!
  14. netpro78

    Mailbox Feature Code

    I have found that after upgrading to version 61 that if the beginning of a phone number matches the mailbox feature code, then the system will access the mailbox instead of looking at the number as a whole for a match. Was there a reason for this change? It has proven problematic.
  15. netpro78

    Spam Scoring

    Is there a way to enable the spam scoring feature on a per domain basis so that you are not paying for queries for domains that do not want the service?
×