Parks Posted June 25, 2009 Report Posted June 25, 2009 We are starting to test for residential service and setup some test accounts. I couldn't get any of the ATAs to register so I thought I'd try to register my x-lite to confirm and couldn't. Here is the log file and everything should be fine. We're using 10 digit btn as their account/extension under 1 domain called residential.vonvox.net. Current system running 3.1.2.3120 [7] 2009/06/24 19:33:02: SIP Rx udp:75.149.48.107:8800: REGISTER sip:residential.vonvox.net SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.5.230:8800;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-4a3a8e79161c7f1e-1---d8754z-;rport Max-Forwards: 70 Contact: <sip:9254185059@192.168.5.230:8800;rinstance=a2889ba708bc4675> To: "Test User2"<sip:9254185059@residential.vonvox.net> From: "Test User2"<sip:9254185059@residential.vonvox.net>;tag=2219607b Call-ID: Yzk0YmFjZGJiOWQxODZhOWUxZDMyMmEwODdkMmZlMGE. CSeq: 1 REGISTER Expires: 300 Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO User-Agent: X-Lite release 1100l stamp 47546 Content-Length: 0 [7] 2009/06/24 19:33:02: SIP Tx udp:75.149.48.107:8800: SIP/2.0 404 Not Found Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.5.230:8800;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-4a3a8e79161c7f1e-1---d8754z-;rport=8800;received=75.149.48.107 From: "Test User2" <sip:9254185059@residential.vonvox.net>;tag=2219607b To: "Test User2" <sip:9254185059@residential.vonvox.net>;tag=07d93e67c8 Call-ID: Yzk0YmFjZGJiOWQxODZhOWUxZDMyMmEwODdkMmZlMGE. CSeq: 1 REGISTER Content-Length: 0 Thanks for the help! Quote
Vodia PBX Posted June 25, 2009 Report Posted June 25, 2009 We are starting to test for residential service and setup some test accounts. I couldn't get any of the ATAs to register so I thought I'd try to register my x-lite to confirm and couldn't. Here is the log file and everything should be fine. We're using 10 digit btn as their account/extension under 1 domain called residential.vonvox.net. You are probably hitting the problem that the number that you register with is a telephone number. Then the PBX compares 9254185059 to +19254185059 and finds no match. Try registering +19254185059, that might solve the problem. This is a kind of a bug; we probably have to change this behavior. Workaround is to use the + format for right now. Quote
Parks Posted June 25, 2009 Author Report Posted June 25, 2009 You are probably hitting the problem that the number that you register with is a telephone number. Then the PBX compares 9254185059 to +19254185059 and finds no match. Try registering +19254185059, that might solve the problem. This is a kind of a bug; we probably have to change this behavior. Workaround is to use the + format for right now. Yes adding +1 worked and will be fine for using but would they still 11 digits and be able to get their voicemails sense we registered with the +? Quote
Vodia PBX Posted June 25, 2009 Report Posted June 25, 2009 Yes adding +1 worked and will be fine for using but would they still 11 digits and be able to get their voicemails sense we registered with the +? I think so. Should be easy to find out! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.