Jump to content

Remote Hosting Option


Recommended Posts

For 13 extensions that should be sufficient. Be careful with the IP addresses - one is enough, make sure the other four are not giving you unneccessary problems.


For good user experience on audio, see http://www.pbxnsip.com/download/qos.ppt.


thanks for the reply. I posted this question to our service provider on chat session please review this log and let me know if ok -


Customer: i have one question: does your router to this server ensures qos , possible a SBC?

Thomas S: No it does not do QOS


Customer: what do you have that does?


Thomas S: I don't think any dedicated server company in the world has a standard server for the cheapest price with QOS to a specific provider. QOS is very expensive hardware to provide.


Thomas S: But we don't have any server with QOS


Thomas S: But in a rack we can provide QOS hardware


Customer: ok thanks


Thomas S: But without QOS our routers are very fast

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, well...


QoS could be reasonable with layer 3 tags. But he is right, practically nobody is doing that today. That's what the PPT speaks about having a 2nd DSL line and use that one only for VoIP - QoS by having physically seperated lines. Seems the router industry still has a long way to go. Until then, pragmatic solutions will make it happen!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...