mattlandis

ahem...wow only works in v4.2 it looks like?...but..powerful! thanks, Matt

4.2.0.3958 (Win32) the problem is we can park a call using this new park orbit account and a park orbit button on a snom phone, (park orbit button on snom phone indicates fine) but we cannot retrieve the call using the button. If we type *86 <ext> we can retreive the parked call. If we use the park orbit button the snom phone it just drops the call. Also, and maybe related: in the new park orbit account type we can't seem to save a value in: "Extensions that may use this orbit:" Matt

sangoma verified it does not work for windows. Actually we aren't looking for a saviour. ;-) We use pattons and are quite happy. But, yes, it would be nice to have a 1 or 2 port fxo that is really cheap. The only problem is that really cheap usually doesn't = "set and forget" but "install and have an eternal pest on your back" ;-) The 2 port patton = approx $350. (SN4112/JO/EUI) Because the cost is not that much different we only stock the 4 port at our company. I can recommend patton fully. Excellent product quality and excellent service. I will post if I find anything low end but I would caution against thinking too cheap. In the end people want something that works day in and out. Matt

so i put in the note field: "this extension user is a real idiot. please keep an eye on him." He logs into his user portal...and leaves the company. ;-) not to mention notes we put in about the ceo... ;-) Matt

you mean "position"? nah nah no. ;-) consider having a "note" field for each object. I would view them as sys admin notes. Matt

LOL!! SUGGESTION: Access page - could "date blocked", "when it will stop being blocked" be added as columns? maybe this makes it clearer. Matt

love it (maybe it was always there? ;-)

It would be nice to be able to attatch notes to each object in snom ONE. extension, trunks especially. But if your going to do it across the board would likely be just as easy. Just a field to type a note in. Matt

SUGGESTION: Access page - could date blocked, when it will stop being blocked be added as columns? I would also be nice to be able to type a note as to why a certain rule is allowed or not allowed. tx! Matt

Yes, this is a known attack. Some of my notes: http://forum.pbxnsip.com/index.php?showtop...amp;#entry17308 We have a site we manage this is experiencing it as well. There are other reports in the wild. I would be glad to compare notes. One thing I am curious is if our blocked IP list matches yours? I would be glad to swap the entire list we have. We have been living in the "Access" page in the last days and have noticed some things I will post as a suggestion.

Our research is indicating: -a SIP brute force Botnet appears to in operation -It is not a massive botnet, perhaps several hundred bots worldwide (our estimation) -very few bots in the USA -user agent = "Asterisk PBX" If there is anything else that would help anyone, let me know. Matt

you think that system is under attack? ;-) think it is some kind of botnet thing or what? It is a different type of attack than I've seen before. Has anyone else? Also it has been sustained for over 24hrs now too. blacklist = absolutely essential. Matt

a suggestion would be to pick one that you support? just an idea. Matt

any pnp/auto configuration of pstn/pri gateway(s) in consideraton for snom ONE? For us, we have our config we use. For others, I see it as a question that will come up. tx matt

here is our list in the last day: 109.245.187.111 109.70.68.142 109.96.244.225 110.137.41.43 110.138.137.249 110.139.148.210 110.159.95.86 110.164.241.121 110.164.34.57 110.225.149.115 111.92.44.229 112.200.118.111 112.204.6.143 113.167.157.173 113.190.31.229 114.141.49.116 114.57.230.122 115.108.33.218 115.242.88.255 115.87.169.116 117.2.11.240 117.204.228.61 117.4.230.72 117.47.71.131 118.174.1.161 118.68.253.94 118.96.33.89 118.96.40.114 118.96.42.235 118.96.7.155 119.158.76.110 119.235.249.26 119.42.82.13 120.50.18.210 122.161.153.108 122.161.242.228 122.161.242.24 122.161.76.67 122.168.35.3 122.177.10.24 122.177.176.36 122.177.201.188 123.16.121.236 123.22.187.100 124.13.33.113 125.163.19.249 125.163.233.244 125.165.186.179 125.165.186.21 125.166.221.252 125.167.176.2 125.60.240.224 178.129.2.87 178.49.17.3 180.214.233.29 180.243.92.84 187.15.19.212 187.32.97.7 187.52.171.10 187.6.218.134 187.79.192.30 188.16.109.63 189.183.28.122 189.19.60.143 189.242.57.212 189.76.88.22 189.82.177.89 190.148.148.198 190.203.137.72 190.206.48.198 190.73.201.156 195.69.222.2 196.205.148.221 200.175.120.178 200.181.230.129 200.207.126.8 201.172.108.207 201.2.95.249 201.250.252.193 201.75.138.124 201.8.206.19 201.92.65.242 202.62.84.22 211.137.104.75 212.150.140.186 212.160.234.71 213.233.92.114 222.123.157.77 222.123.158.173 222.127.232.73 222.127.78.73 222.247.49.18 222.253.99.45 223.205.32.232 24.132.59.185 41.140.164.114 41.155.23.15 41.176.133.69 41.178.183.244 41.184.20.22 41.199.2.29 41.214.184.67 41.235.239.150 41.238.232.197 41.238.233.181 41.238.234.174 41.238.234.94 41.238.235.130 41.238.235.50 58.186.20.21 58.9.135.120 59.99.186.90 60.51.93.184 62.139.231.77 74.115.0.36 74.115.1.16 74.115.1.19 74.115.1.6 77.253.119.145 77.69.159.19 78.163.59.14 78.170.163.154 78.177.30.35 78.185.114.81 78.85.185.23 79.101.232.49 79.176.107.33 79.178.24.66 79.181.49.254 80.171.100.198 81.214.241.166 82.213.146.26 83.149.44.32 83.235.23.19 83.6.86.63 85.102.208.216 85.104.134.143 85.106.193.117 85.195.133.26 85.26.232.17 85.26.233.244 85.65.221.100 85.75.124.78 85.97.210.219 85.97.46.26 85.97.88.254 85.99.150.26 86.51.233.204 88.231.1.219 88.233.184.122 88.234.196.153 88.243.112.205 88.247.54.72 88.251.35.217 89.223.211.78 89.254.238.132 89.33.147.244 91.176.139.109 92.28.193.38 92.46.213.248 92.49.195.173 92.84.250.210 93.114.180.59 94.108.208.88 94.129.132.7 94.178.187.109 94.72.94.136 94.97.31.66 95.154.118.65 95.209.9.104

yup, checking... Matt

@ukengb, if usbfxo works for you, let me know. if it is rock solid it may fit into our strategy. Matt

We have a system that is being attacked by a big number of IP's all around the world. (100's of ip's) Anyone else seeing this type of attack? Matt

@pbxnsip you pretty sure the usbfxo works? sangoma states its only for asterisk. (i'd be glad to be wrong) Matt

I could agree with new soft phone. Make it of 82x or 870. ;-) let me know when its available. matt

Hello Positive, We currently use the patton 4114 after testing a few others. Probably your biggest question is how to configure it? I can send config file and instructions to you if PM me. Matt

#1-don't think our does that? hmm let me verify... #2- currently no beep. at least on ours. ;-) #3 ;-)

Hello, >do softphones count? The limitation (as I understand it-and my tests) does apply to softphones or any UA that registers. >stupid lets try to keep a respectful atmosphere ;-) >door phone actually the snom pa1 can act as a door phone....i'm working on an article about that.. But also remember you can have 2 non-snom devices (as snom is communicating to us today) >snom softphone doesn't count... Don't write that thing off! ;-) For as old as it is it is pretty amazing actually. >they shouldn't keep it a secret... it does jarr with the "no limits" slogon. I can't disagree. >Let's be clear on this, what constitutes a third party device the 10 user limit is based on extensions added into the system. not extensions registered (as i understand). For example you could have 10 extension and concievably 2 UA's registered as extension 40 for a total devices of 11 (or more.) I think (as i understand) the 2 non-snom devices is based on devices registered. >I don't appreciate companies making obvious information like this so hard to come by. I don't think this is attempted. I think (surmising here) there may be some things snom is still trying to decide. So that may be the reason for unclear communication. My experience from working with pbxnsip is that they are very frank. You may need to talk to them to best answer all your questions. > I want to be able to supply systems for residential and small business and ... you will want to use snom ONE free. to drive price as low as possible this is the simple choice. Remember you can't have everything you want and at your price too. ;-) Set some limitations for yourself: we are a 12 person MS gold partner and even we do. We only sell Windows based systems. Before snom set the limitation we only sold snom handsets. To say you will provide the cheapest solution and support everything under the sun isn't realistic. Who can argue with a commercial grade software phone system with 10 windows only softphones for free? ;-) >pbxnsip licenseing is confusing At our company we always (always) sold pbxnsip Pro Plus licenses. Then you don't have any thing to bite you. As i said before you need to set the boundries of what you do to avoid trouble. ;-) >waste of time... snom ONE is not a waste of time. We gladly paid $100 per ext. for what we now get for free. -This product is feature rich, rock solid and secure -It integrates to MS Lync, Exchange and SQL! -it run on Windows, Mac and Linux! -It has a ton of admin features that make it nice to admin ...and...FREE. Wow. ;-) Matt

why not just use a sip trunk if lowest budget is big concern? then NO fxo is needed...thats even cheaper! ;-) take care, matt

Here is an interesting little device that i would say would have more hope: http://sangoma.com/products/hardware_produ...ny/usb_fxo.html but only for asterisk at moment i think. matt