mattlandis

Okay, I dug up an old thread i worked with somewhere else: http://www.teleon.net/product.html I wouldn't recommend it because in the end you'll buy a real fxo but if your a tinkerer try it and let me know. ;-) I hear one problem with modem is the chipsets work in half duplex? i dont claim to know the technical details. Matt

answered over here: http://forum.pbxnsip.com/index.php?showtop...amp;#entry17230 no sure if it is by domain. From my tests today it appears it is by system. Could snom chime in on that part?

Once it works I'd like to here about it. Please email me directly. I'm sure usrobotics would be glad to put all their modem technology to good use that is becoming outdated. Matt

Hello, First of all I'm not snom and I do wish as well that 3rdparty was not restricted. But to correct some miscommunication before it gets spread: -All snom products will work with snom ONE. so snom m9 will work. it will actually automatically provision. -snom actually does have a soft phone. Softphone link here: http://windowspbx.blogspot.com/p/snom-one-resources.html -snom is quite clear that you can still use pbxnsip for multi-vendor senarios Here are some FAQ on snom ONE i've compiled that may help: http://windowspbx.blogspot.com/2010/10/var...d-findings.html But to agree with you snom ONE does: -very limited Mac softphone, mobile softphones, video phones, ability to use 3rdparty helper apps like VOP, nch apps, wifi phones, sip door phones, sip ceiling speakers and a host of other sip devices. Or even sites with existing sip handsets. Also on the snom softphone: it is a bit dated but does run on win7. it gives the complete functinality of snom 360 included BLF! I'm not sure snom supports the snom softphone either. But there have been comments about "resurrecting" it. I have been a proponent of snom having a softphone before snom ONE was on the scene so my opinion stands there. ;-) Quite frankly a software version of the snom 870 (+ ocs/lync) would be extremely interesting considering that it is touch screen it should move to PC easier. My video on snom softphone: http://windowspbx.blogspot.com/2010/02/int...-from-snom.html I am hoping snom finds a way to remove this limitation. snom ONE (pbxnsip for that matter) is an excellent phone system. Excellent. But once again, you can still get pbxnsip which is identical to snom one except it has multivendor support, no free edition and paid editions cost more. Matt

Hello, Am I missing something? I know this is part snom phone post and part snom ONE post. But since this is now one company i guess I can post this here! (benefit of integrated solution! ;-) #1 Does pbxnsip/snom one has a way to pnp provision which snom extensions are part of a multi-cast page? For example I would like ext 40, 41, 42 to listen to, say, 224.1.1.2:4000. and I would like 40,45,46 to listen for multicast 224.1.1.2:4001 I know i can log into each snom phone ;-), but is there a way to have this pnp provisioned? It seems quite hard to admin if there is not a way. I would envision that in the multicast paging group there would be a "destination extensions" field that would send the info to pnp files. This may bring up the issue that there is no clear place to look to see pnp info for a specific handset/MAC (or is there?) as opposed to an extension, which is perhaps a seperate problem. Another problem I can see is that someone could go hog wild and have one handset/MAC a part of more than 10 multi-cast...and how would snom ONE take care of that...hmm...maybe an error pop if an admin tries to save a multicast paging group that makes a handset/MAC be a part of more than 10 multi-cast IP addresses? #2 when a snom phone recieves a multicast page there is no indication on the recieving phone that it is getting a page? Shouldn't there be? #3 a last issue is that there appears to be no way to set the volume that the recieving snom phone plays a mutli-cast broadcast? It seems there should be a way to set the mutli-cast playback volume seperate from say phone volume or ringer volume. The default is far to loud. thanks matt

you pretty confident of your network infrastructure? problem is likely there. also Is there a reason you still on version 3.4? matt

"freindly scanner" attacks are going around very regular. if pbx is not prepared, it will go down. ;-) tx matt

if you want to not worry about destination client you will need to use the pbx intercom provision. Test if pbx intercom works with m9. ( i don t have one) Be aware not all softwphones do pbx intercom. btw--please send me a m9. I want one. ;-) Matt

Modem are not a pstn gateway and no way to make them do that. (i've checked ;-) You will need a pstn gateway / fxo. something like: http://windowspbx.blogspot.com/2010/02/mos...atton-411x.html I use patton 4114. Matt

Yes, http://www.pbxnsip.com/download-software/software.php Matt

Upgrade to 4.x and get blacklisting working right away. http://windowspbx.blogspot.com/2010/10/som...-into-your.html Matt

suggestion: in the account list have some red notice. when you hold mouse over it or click it tells which is the offending password. idea Matt

Thanks!! Matt

Hello, I'm curious if there is a way to say such and such an extension changed one of there pw's to a simple password? I'm not sure how to implement but i would be nice to be able to know some user didn't change password to simple password. any thots? matt

what is there looks pretty good. It looks promising. But...logging in as console no longer works? there are never extension displayed even though the ext. in question has some setup. Matt

Hi, I think you must have nailed pnp provisioning because it now seems to work so that anybody can provision a phone. Bravo!!! My experience is that if there is a "*" in the MAC field of the extension in snom ONE (as snom ONE comes default) and you plug a phone in the first phone provisioned seems to get 40, but the next one get 49! Could you guys make it so there is some dicernable order that it picks the next extension? one would expect if * is in all extensions to start out it would go in order: 40, 41, 42,...etc. Any comments? Matt

Just provisioned a snom 870 and it provisioned perfectly. Great. It also does not display the "feature" of the 3xx models where when they provision they reboot and reload the firmware even though they already have the correct version of the firmware. Thankfully! This behaviour of 3xx series re-ignites my disgust each time I have to wait through it. ;-) Also, when I had the OCS firmware it did not automatically provision on snomone. I loaded the 870 non-ocs firmware then everything worked perfect. tx matt

Hello, The "listen in" is great! The one issue is if a manager wants to monitor a certain agent, is it possible to stay listening to all calls from a certain extension? when *83 <ext> is dialed it connect manager to ongoing call but manager needs to dial it again when extension makes the next call. thanks Matt

ah!! i see the size problem...the page is 11.7" tall. standard paper is 11. You might want to fix that. in the mean time for the rest of us a work around is to set printer to "size to fit" . tX! Matt

http://wiki.snomone.com/index.php?title=Downloads for me the top margin is too small and it gets cut off but otherwise very nice sheets. thanks. Matt

Hi, the snom softphone is quite interesting. It is basically a snom 360 softphone (complete with blf) I did a video review a little while ago that might be interesting: http://windowspbx.blogspot.com/2010/02/int...-from-snom.html Matt

our experience is that pbxnsip runs extremely solid. (we run on Windows o/s) What version are you running? If you have an older than v4 without the automatic blacklisting sip attacks can take your pbx down. Restarting the service could stop the attack? just a wild thot. Matt

appreciate that. so any pbxnsip license over 20 will become a unlimited license in snom ONE? My question is how pbxnsip license convert. thanks! matt

Hello, some more questions that occurred to me: #1-with snom ONE will there be the need to pay maintenance yearly to stay up-to-date? or will it be more like snom handset firmware--? #2-will pbxnsip clients be able to transition to snom ONE some how? thanks! Matt

release notes would be great with each release. and maybe at a standard place? I'm not demanding. ;-) seriously I think it would be a good practice. Matt