hosted Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 It would be nice if we can specify the voice processes to run on its own processor.. so the web and non-critical functions can run on a different processor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vodia PBX Posted October 6, 2008 Report Share Posted October 6, 2008 It would be nice if we can specify the voice processes to run on its own processor.. so the web and non-critical functions can run on a different processor. Agree. We have plans to take advantage of the upcoming multiple-core processors, so that we can e.g. run 14 RTP processes on a 16-core CPU. That would make it possible to perform around 1500 transcoding sessions using G.729A. That should make the discussion about media-relay superfluous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hosted Posted October 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 7, 2008 wow thats cool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hosted Posted October 31, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 31, 2008 Agree. We have plans to take advantage of the upcoming multiple-core processors, so that we can e.g. run 14 RTP processes on a 16-core CPU. That would make it possible to perform around 1500 transcoding sessions using G.729A. That should make the discussion about media-relay superfluous. What estimation time do you think this will be ready? I don't need transcoding, but i do need high volume of media relaying. And is it possible to I stick multiple NIC's in 1 box and have each domain relay out a given NIC/IP ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vodia PBX Posted October 31, 2008 Report Share Posted October 31, 2008 What estimation time do you think this will be ready? I don't need transcoding, but i do need high volume of media relaying. And is it possible to I stick multiple NIC's in 1 box and have each domain relay out a given NIC/IP ? Well, it will definively take time. There is no concrete plan available yet. In the meantime the workaround is to partition the userbase and run several processes on a multi-core. A server farm on a single chip. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hosted Posted October 31, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 31, 2008 so have 4 instances of pbxnsip running on each core? I suppose if i did that then I could bind each instance to its own NIC... this freaking rocks. now i need to load test that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.