netpro78 Posted June 17, 2020 Report Share Posted June 17, 2020 Is there any plan to add support for signing outbound calls since it will soon be a FCC requirement? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vodia PBX Posted June 18, 2020 Report Share Posted June 18, 2020 We checked the topic some time ago—as far as I can see this is a topic for the service provider. Even if we would support it, I am not aware about any service provider where we would even have the chance to use it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
netpro78 Posted June 18, 2020 Author Report Share Posted June 18, 2020 According to the FCC anyone selling services to an end user will be required to implement STIR/SHAKEN. In my opinion this is the majority of your customers that operate in the US that have multiple domains. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vodia PBX Posted June 19, 2020 Report Share Posted June 19, 2020 We are not against it at all, actually believe that this is a great step into reducing SPAM and increasing office productivity. There is a nice description on the Bandwidth web page (https://www.bandwidth.com/glossary/stir-shaken/) that explains the call flow. The PBX is either the "calling party" or the "called party", authentication is done through username and password. So the PBX would be the "end user"—even if the PBX is not physically on the end user premises. Do you know any SIP trunk provider that would parse STIR/SHAKEN headers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
netpro78 Posted June 19, 2020 Author Report Share Posted June 19, 2020 https://www.inteliquent.com Currently supports STIR/SHAKEN. I recently attended one of their webinars on the service, and the coming requirements. They currently have some larger carriers like Comcast, and T-Mobile utilizing their service. My takeaway is that many carriers such as Inteliquent will have a hosted service where they can sign the calls for you (however they will only provide the highest attestation for their own numbers), the problem comes about if you are doing least cost routing, then the only real solution is to apply the certificate to the PBX, and sign all of your own calls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.