mattlandis Posted June 15, 2011 Report Share Posted June 15, 2011 As I play with CSTA I think (as snom already suggested) that it would be a good idea to possibly offload the csta processing to a second core as a first step to utilizing more cores. If there are 100 clients getting CSTA updates this may put a little load on initial core? you know more how much load this will be more than me but it sees like it could be plenty if 100users get updates for 100 extensions. (worst case i know ;-) Also if CSTA IM is supported eventually this would take this off main core as well. just a random thot, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.