Jump to content

Teams Trunk question


Recommended Posts

Long time no post :)

PBX 68.0.16

I would prefer to setup teams end points correctly as per MS doco where you should be running a command like so,

Set-CsPhoneNumberAssignment -Identity xxx@xx.com.xx -PhoneNumber "61XXXXXXXXX;ext=801" -PhoneNumberType DirectRouting 

This will define the users "Assigned phone number" plus also their "Phone number extension" which displays neatly in teams so the end user can see their DID with in teams. 

As the PBX will send the invite as 801@xx.com.xx to teams it won't ring the teams end point when setup as above unless the PBX extension is setup as the DID with the extension number as an 'alias' however this is not ideal config. 

Is there a way to tweak the trunk settings with some advanced custom headers to send the invite based on the extensions defined DID failing that followed by the extension number for endpoints that might not have a DID?



Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

So, did you ever get to messing around with this?

The Teams admin GUI now caters for inputting the DID / extension separately which makes it present neatly on the team's client. 

so instead of setting, the three-digit extension as the "DID" we should be setting that as the extension as per above, but the trunk would need a option for it. 


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
3 hours ago, Vodia Telephone System said:

Unfortunately it can't be done with the simple settings.

If we do it, it will have to be done in code.

Obviously due to the lack of response.. so when are you going to support Teams integration better?. Add on's, plugins, integrations all ways seem to be half baked in my experience with the pbx. I have a list of a lot more things wrong with Teams integration...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well many people are using it and they mostly use it as an extension as it was intended.

Even with putting the DID there works well (maybe just the cosmetics may not look so good in case you name the accounts as DIDs), but by no means will anyone call it half baked, definitely people who are are using it and happy with it.

Can you please tell us the remaining list wrong or not implemented?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...